Poll: Should we have a Tier 1 League Sheet?
This poll is closed.
Yes
80.00%
8 80.00%
No
20.00%
2 20.00%
Total 10 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tier 1 League Sheet
#91

So you score both goals and rotate twice, leaving you in the same formation? That's a little strange.

Taha
My belief is that I get to make fun of your beliefs. Please respect my belief.
Reply
#92
No your forward would move to goalie and the player off the table subs in as forward in that situation.
- Casti
Reply
#93
You rotate only once. Otherwise you can manipulate someone not playing forward.
"Man's way to God is with beer in hand." - some Belgium monk
Reply
#94
A team that has scored (1 or 2) goals since the previous 2-ball serving rotates (once) before the next 2-balls are served.

That's the only reasonable approach. Rotation is at the serving cycle.

Just like in the old (1-ball) roto, a team that has scored rotates players. Now, having played two balls, it can be one or both teams that rotate, but only once per 2-ball cycle.
[img]http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/angry/angry-old-man-smiley-emoticon.gif[/img]

Reply
#95
Ya I agree you should simply rotate everytime 2 balls are served together
http://www.netfoos.com
Reply
#96
(04-Apr-2013, 07:36 PM)5barwarrior Wrote: You rotate only once. Otherwise you can manipulate someone not playing forward.

This is assuming you are able to score whenever you want and let in goals whenever you want. But IMO Rollerball is the game on the league sheet with the least control over who scores when... I highly doubt a team could work it so that one of their players didn't play forward.

I like the idea of rotating for each goal scored rather than just one rotation regardless of how many goals were scored (1 or 2). The reason being that it makes it a little more interesting. It does make it a bit more complicated I guess, so if the general consensus is that a scoring team is to rotate one player at the start of each round (both balls being served), then I'm cool with that. It's simple, now we just need to make sure everyone understands that that is how it'll be.
Reply
#97
We only rotated once, I dunno wtf Packer is talking about we never switch twice. How I said it the previous page is how we did it.
Reply
#98
rule will be on league sheet, this issue can rest in peace
[img]http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/angry/angry-old-man-smiley-emoticon.gif[/img]

Reply
#99
(05-Apr-2013, 10:32 AM)Jester Wrote: We only rotated once, I dunno wtf Packer is talking about we never switch twice. How I said it the previous page is how we did it.

We didn't roto twice cuz we never scored both goals at once. But they did, and we had them roto twice. Doesn't matter tho we'll go with one roto
Reply
(04-Apr-2013, 07:36 PM)5barwarrior Wrote: You rotate only once. Otherwise you can manipulate someone not playing forward.

I think this should be considered strategic and allowed.

I like the double rotate rule on 2 goals scored. Sounds cool.
Reply
you're warped on occasion... you or your judgment that is [Image: http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n409/...y_Beer.jpg] and regardless I mean that in the best possible term of the sense
other than that we both think you're peachy [Image: http://www.sherv.net/cm/emoticons/playfu...oticon.gif] never mind manipulations, there is no sensible logic in the idea of rotating twice
[img]http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/angry/angry-old-man-smiley-emoticon.gif[/img]

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)