28-Nov-2012, 01:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-Nov-2012, 01:37 PM by 5000 Years Old Man.)
How to level the field for diverse talent and still spur competition. All the tried and well worn alternatives... Handicaps, Rankings, Controlling talent for team compositions, and more
The present one is best. Regardless of abilities the incentives are for winning and for playing in upper tiers - as opposed to considering sandbagging - possibly not quite 100% but close to that the best I ever observed
Performance gives better standings. Composition of tiers changes adjusting to performance. After 3 weeks 2 teams get shifted up and 2 get shifted down, middle tier changing half of its teams. There is variety to a point, to a reasonable point. Match-ups are not blow-ups to a point, to a reasonable point
By all means keep suggesting changes and perfectioning you all.
cute
collective experience you punk
remember I have photos
The present one is best. Regardless of abilities the incentives are for winning and for playing in upper tiers - as opposed to considering sandbagging - possibly not quite 100% but close to that the best I ever observed
Performance gives better standings. Composition of tiers changes adjusting to performance. After 3 weeks 2 teams get shifted up and 2 get shifted down, middle tier changing half of its teams. There is variety to a point, to a reasonable point. Match-ups are not blow-ups to a point, to a reasonable point
By all means keep suggesting changes and perfectioning you all.
(28-Nov-2012, 01:13 PM)Paul Wrote: you mean personal experience?
cute
collective experience you punk
remember I have photos
[img]http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/angry/angry-old-man-smiley-emoticon.gif[/img]