Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Doubles Matchups
#2
it looks pretty good Packer.... at least, better than the sheet we were using.

also try and keep in mind that I believe the rest of the sheet deserves consideration when making those doubles match-ups... i.e. if there is a sweep in doubles, does one player on my team end up playing less overall during the entire night? i think that was one of Chris' considerations back in the day... i could be mistaken. (for example, because player 2 only plays one singles game - in the 'specialty' category - all night.....)

granted, it's a minor consideration. just wanted to throw it out there. i'm happy with your new set up.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 01-Dec-2012, 04:57 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by jpguywatchout - 01-Dec-2012, 10:30 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5000 Years Old Man - 02-Dec-2012, 03:04 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 02-Dec-2012, 07:11 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by Jester - 03-Dec-2012, 12:10 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 03-Dec-2012, 11:59 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by deliverance - 03-Dec-2012, 12:34 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5barwarrior - 03-Dec-2012, 10:21 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by jpguywatchout - 03-Dec-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 03-Dec-2012, 12:45 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by deliverance - 03-Dec-2012, 10:51 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5barwarrior - 03-Dec-2012, 12:29 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by jpguywatchout - 03-Dec-2012, 12:33 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5barwarrior - 03-Dec-2012, 01:27 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5000 Years Old Man - 03-Dec-2012, 01:32 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5000 Years Old Man - 03-Dec-2012, 05:17 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by deliverance - 03-Dec-2012, 01:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)