Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Doubles Matchups
#13
(03-Dec-2012, 12:28 PM)jpguywatchout Wrote: remember that sheet? that's the one we've been using for the past few weeks...

It's the same one I was printing all summer, and the same one we've used for the first 7 weeks of this season lol. I don't know what happened but it's no ones fault, and not an issue as long as we change it moving forward.

Nobody has agreed that my math works out.. Should we use my proposed solution for the doubles matches or are we saying that there is now a bias in the other games that was originally accounted for with the bias in the original doubles match set up?

What is the next step?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 01-Dec-2012, 04:57 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by jpguywatchout - 01-Dec-2012, 10:30 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5000 Years Old Man - 02-Dec-2012, 03:04 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 02-Dec-2012, 07:11 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by Jester - 03-Dec-2012, 12:10 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 03-Dec-2012, 11:59 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by deliverance - 03-Dec-2012, 12:34 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5barwarrior - 03-Dec-2012, 10:21 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by jpguywatchout - 03-Dec-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by PACKER - 03-Dec-2012, 12:45 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by deliverance - 03-Dec-2012, 10:51 AM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5barwarrior - 03-Dec-2012, 12:29 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by jpguywatchout - 03-Dec-2012, 12:33 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5barwarrior - 03-Dec-2012, 01:27 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5000 Years Old Man - 03-Dec-2012, 01:32 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by 5000 Years Old Man - 03-Dec-2012, 05:17 PM
RE: Doubles Matchups - by deliverance - 03-Dec-2012, 01:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)