24-Jan-2013, 01:10 PM
OK, I gotta chime in on this thread here...
1) 2-Ball is hella fun... it also teaches valuable skillsets. It's great for exercising reaction time, loose ball skills, etc. Quite a few people in Ottawa could benefit from more 2-ball, or another fastball type game.
2) Roto doubles shouldn't be limited to only one game. When I first started playing in league, the only time I ever got to touch forward in doubles was in Roto, and without that, I never would have developed any forward skills. If the aim of this new and improved sheet is to make us better players, we need more than 1 game of Roto.
3) 3-Man sucks. We've been saying this for years.
4) If everyone plays singles, and specialty, and there's 1 roto game, then it CLEARLY sucks to be player 3 now. There's no upside to it at all. There's no getting around this either, someone obviously gets the short end of the stick.
My vote would be to switch 3-Man with something that doesn't suck, maybe roto singles? Otherwise the sheet is as fair and balanced as it gets.
1) 2-Ball is hella fun... it also teaches valuable skillsets. It's great for exercising reaction time, loose ball skills, etc. Quite a few people in Ottawa could benefit from more 2-ball, or another fastball type game.
2) Roto doubles shouldn't be limited to only one game. When I first started playing in league, the only time I ever got to touch forward in doubles was in Roto, and without that, I never would have developed any forward skills. If the aim of this new and improved sheet is to make us better players, we need more than 1 game of Roto.
3) 3-Man sucks. We've been saying this for years.
4) If everyone plays singles, and specialty, and there's 1 roto game, then it CLEARLY sucks to be player 3 now. There's no upside to it at all. There's no getting around this either, someone obviously gets the short end of the stick.
My vote would be to switch 3-Man with something that doesn't suck, maybe roto singles? Otherwise the sheet is as fair and balanced as it gets.