2014 Winter League Schedule - Rotation 4

[deliverance]

You keep failing to understand my point at all.

This is all not likely to happen:

1) We might not even play on Garlando.
2) Who is going to be within 2 points of us? Your team or any other team has to win every single week from here on out, and we have to lose a bunch to get to that since we have points in the bank.
3) You got mine and Jesse's answer, which was yes if we have to play on Garlando we have an approved sub for us, this is Tier 1 figure out how to win. There are 2 other players on the team you can work on shutting down if it comes to that.
4) You're making false statements about our sub policies in the past.

So what is this about then? Were you expecting a different response? You're trying to stir the pot...that's exactly what you're doing.

---

Think about it from our point of view:

We need a sub for the next 5 weeks. Clearly based on your incorrect allegations that we try to play with 2 players every time, it's preferred we grab a 3rd.

So does it not make sense to secure a player who is equal on Tornado to Packer for 5 weeks of Packer's absence, vs trying to grab someone else (who?) on the off-chance we might happen to have to play 1 more week on Garlando (not likely since we just did this rotation of Garlando in Tier 1, so other 2 teams will have to play it out next time).

$50 says our team doesn't even play on Garlando from here on out (regular season). Any takers?