15-Jan-2015, 02:52 PM
No they are completely relevant because this is a discussion on a lot of what-if's which are not going to happen if you look at the schedule. This entire league the format has been: you play on Garlando on one rotation, the next your team doesn't so it balances out who plays on garlando in each rotation for that tier. We took that into account when the sub was chosen, so we're talking about a hypothetical scenario which isn't going to happen.
There's no personal attacks here, like I mentioned, your team has been incosistent in Tier 1, so you gotta worry about winning every single week anyways AND for our team to somehow be stuck playing on Garlando two rotations in a row for this to be relevant, so it's very speculative and hypothetical at this stage.
Of the 3 times we were missing players this league: One was played as 2-man, we lost, one of the subs was Hoss (we lost), the other was Ben last week (vs the tier 2 team that moved up) and we won that one on Garlando.
There's no personal attacks here, like I mentioned, your team has been incosistent in Tier 1, so you gotta worry about winning every single week anyways AND for our team to somehow be stuck playing on Garlando two rotations in a row for this to be relevant, so it's very speculative and hypothetical at this stage.
Of the 3 times we were missing players this league: One was played as 2-man, we lost, one of the subs was Hoss (we lost), the other was Ben last week (vs the tier 2 team that moved up) and we won that one on Garlando.
- Casti